I don't think that I do.
I seem remember being taught in US History and in the various government classes I've taken that when the US Constitution was written, that there were 3 distinct branches of the government. They set it up that way so one branch wouldn't get too powerful. It was set up as a 'checks and balances' system.
These 3 branches were given specific responsibilities. The legislature makes the laws, the executive enforces the laws and the judicial makes sure the laws are fair.
Here in NY, the lines between the branches have blurred beyond recognition. The judicial branch seems to think that they can make the laws.
Specifically I'm referring to the recent ruling that NY must recognize gay marriages entered into in other jurisdictions that allow them to be performed (i.e. Canada, MA or CA).
According to NYS law, such marriages are not legal to be performed, so why is it that something that is illegal to do in NY, would be approved of if it was done in another place, then transplanted here?
It would be like saying it is illegal to produce heroin in NY, but if it is legal to produce it somewhere else, you can bring it to NY to use it.
I think that the simplest way for the government to take care of the gay marriage thing is to have the government not recognize any marriage.
Think about it.. marriage was originally a religious institution. It was made a government institution by societies where the Church was the State.
I seem remember being taught in US History and in the various government classes I've taken that when the US Constitution was written, that there were 3 distinct branches of the government. They set it up that way so one branch wouldn't get too powerful. It was set up as a 'checks and balances' system.
These 3 branches were given specific responsibilities. The legislature makes the laws, the executive enforces the laws and the judicial makes sure the laws are fair.
Here in NY, the lines between the branches have blurred beyond recognition. The judicial branch seems to think that they can make the laws.
Specifically I'm referring to the recent ruling that NY must recognize gay marriages entered into in other jurisdictions that allow them to be performed (i.e. Canada, MA or CA).
According to NYS law, such marriages are not legal to be performed, so why is it that something that is illegal to do in NY, would be approved of if it was done in another place, then transplanted here?
It would be like saying it is illegal to produce heroin in NY, but if it is legal to produce it somewhere else, you can bring it to NY to use it.
I think that the simplest way for the government to take care of the gay marriage thing is to have the government not recognize any marriage.
Think about it.. marriage was originally a religious institution. It was made a government institution by societies where the Church was the State.
2 comments:
so does this mean you are anti marriage or only anti gay marriage?
(or are you just proposing a theory?) Just curious...
I am assuming that you are not anti marriage--just using the marriage issue to comment on our screwed up government...
Post a Comment